This opinion article by JD Smith, “Smaller-Scale Community Solar Projects Can Ease Utility Bills,” argues that Wisconsin should expand access to community solar as a practical solution for rising energy costs, local economic development, and renewable energy growth. Smith, Director of Business Development at Arch Solar, explains that many Wisconsin families and businesses are struggling with increasing utility bills while lacking affordable options to control energy expenses. He believes community solar could provide a more accessible and locally controlled path toward clean energy adoption.
Community solar allows multiple households, businesses, or organizations to subscribe to a shared solar array and receive credits on their electricity bills without installing rooftop panels themselves. Smith emphasizes that this model is especially beneficial for renters, homeowners with shaded or unsuitable roofs, and residents who cannot afford the upfront cost of private solar systems. By participating in a community solar project, subscribers can still benefit from renewable energy savings and reduced utility costs.
A central argument in the article is that Wisconsin’s proposed community solar projects would be much smaller than the large utility-scale solar farms that sometimes generate controversy. Smith advocates projects typically covering 20 to 40 acres, which could be developed on marginal farmland, brownfields, or underutilized land. He argues these smaller projects would give local governments and communities more influence over siting decisions while helping farmers diversify income streams and preserve productive agricultural land.
Smith also contends that Wisconsin is falling behind neighboring states such as Illinois and Minnesota, where community solar programs already exist and have supported job growth in the renewable energy industry. Because Wisconsin lacks enabling legislation, companies like Arch Solar often send employees to other states to work on community solar projects instead of creating those opportunities locally. He believes new legislation could strengthen Wisconsin’s clean energy economy while keeping energy investments and jobs within the state.
The article further addresses concerns raised by utility companies, which argue community solar could shift grid maintenance costs onto non-participating customers. Smith and other advocates counter that increased market competition and distributed renewable energy can lower long-term energy costs while improving energy resilience. He frames community solar as a balanced approach that combines consumer choice, local control, environmental responsibility, and economic opportunity.
