Understanding Commercial Solar Rate Structures in Wisconsin

cover image for blog of understanding commercial solar rate structures in Wisconsin

For Wisconsin businesses considering solar energy, understanding your utility rate structure is one of the most important steps in evaluating potential savings. While solar panels directly offset electricity consumption, the financial benefits of a solar investment can vary significantly depending on how your utility charges both electricity and demand rates. 

Commercial electric bills in Wisconsin are typically made up of two primary components: energy charges and demand charges. Knowing which rate structure applies to your facility can help determine the ideal solar system design and maximize long-term returns. 

Energy-Only Rates 

Many small commercial customers are billed primarily based on the amount of electricity they consume each month. This type of billing structure charges businesses for every kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity used, making it one of the simplest utility rate structures. 

For businesses on energy-only rates, solar provides direct savings by reducing the amount of electricity purchased from the utility. Every kilowatt-hour generated by the solar array offsets a kilowatt-hour that would otherwise be bought from the grid. Retail stores, offices, churches, schools, and smaller manufacturing facilities often fall into this category. 

Since savings are directly tied to energy production, matching monthly solar generation to energy consumption is typically the primary design goal. Arch analyzes a site’s energy bills and works within the space provided to create a system that produces enough energy to offset monthly utility bills for decades. 

An example of a solar system on energy-only rates is Milwaukee Community Sailing Center. 

With a barrel roof, Arch designed the system to maximize energy production complements the Center’s existing geothermal infrastructure 

Aerial image of Milwaukee Community Sailing Center’s solar array.  

Time of Use (TOU) Rates and Demand Charges 

Time-of-use (TOU) rate programs charge different electricity prices depending on the time of day. Electricity used during peak demand periods costs more, while off-peak electricity is billed at a lower rate. 

This structure creates an additional advantage for solar energy because peak solar production typically occurs during daytime hours, when electricity prices are often highest. By generating power during these premium-rate periods, businesses can offset some of the most expensive energy on their utility bill. 

In addition to TOU, larger commercial and industrial facilities are often subject to demand charges in addition to standard energy charges. Demand charges are based on the highest amount of power a facility uses during a short interval—typically 15 minutes—within a billing period. 

Many Wisconsin utilities use multiple demand components. For example, some tariffs include an On-Peak Demand charge, which measures a customer’s highest demand during designated peak hours, along with a Non-Coincident (NC) Maximum Demand charge, which is based on the facility’s highest demand regardless of when it occurs. With On-Peak Demand rates, a facility is monitored and charged for the maximum power draw during an on peak period, usually between 9AM – 9PM. NC Maximum Demand charges are typically based on the highest demand recorded during the current billing period, although some utility tariffs include demand ratchets that use the highest demand over the previous 12 months when calculating charges. 

For many Wisconsin manufacturers, warehouses, and large commercial operations, demand charges can account for a substantial portion of monthly utility costs. Equipment startups, HVAC systems, refrigeration equipment, and production machinery can all contribute to demand peaks. 

Just one demand spike can significantly impact a utility bill. Solar can help reduce demand charges when a facility’s peak usage occurs during solar production hours. However, facilities with evening or early morning peaks may benefit from combining solar with battery storage to maximize demand savings. 

Image of company comparison with a spike in power creating a high demand charge on a utility bill. Credit: Chargepoint 

An example of a solar system using demand rates is the Pleasant Prairie RecPlex. Energy-intensive equipment such as pool heating systems and other mechanical loads contribute to the facility’s demand charges. 

Arch installed a 999kW system in the fall of 2025 to offset these high demand charges.  

Aerial image of Pleasant Prairie RecPlex solar system installed by Arch Solar. 

An example of a solar system designed for time-of-use rates is the Pettit National Ice Center. By generating electricity during daytime hours, the Pettit Center offsets higher on-peak energy costs and reduces its reliance on utility power when rates are highest. 

An aerial image of Pettit National Ice Center’s solar installation.  

Customer Use Rates 

Some Wisconsin utilities also offer customer use or excess generation tariffs that compensate businesses for electricity exported back to the grid. 

For example, We Energies has a CGS-CU rate, which applies to customers with generating systems up to 5MW. With this rate, the exact credit you receive for excess generation depends on your specific voltage level and the season.  

While customer use rates vary among utilities, these programs can improve overall project economics by ensuring excess production still provides financial value. Arch’s team of energy experts will evaluate your utility tariff and energy usage profile to determine whether a customer use rate provides additional value for your project. 

Why Rate Analysis Matters 

Understanding your utility rate structure is the first step toward maximizing the value of a commercial solar investment. Whether your business is billed on energy consumption, demand charges, time-of-use rates, or customer use tariffs, Arch Solar can help identify the most effective strategy for long-term savings. Contact our team to schedule a complimentary utility bill analysis and explore how solar can work for your facility. 

At A Glance

  • System Size

    173.6kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $28,483 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metered

  • Environmental Equivalents

    184,864 Pounds of Coal

At A Glance

  • System Size

    26kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $4,238 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    Two Rivers Water & Light

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    2,411,958 Smartphones Charged

At A Glance

  • System Size

    23.8kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $3,716 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    Alliant Energy

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    1,948 Pounds of Coal

At A Glance

  • System Size

    197.6kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $22,293 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metered

  • Environmental Equivalents

    20,695 Gallons of Gas

At A Glance

  • System Size

    149.5kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $23,913 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metered

  • Environmental Equivalents

    1.8 Tanker Trucks of Gas

At A Glance

  • System Size

    123kw

  • Estimated Savings

  • Utility Provider

    Madison Gas & Electric

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    13,709,514 Smartphones Charged

At A Glance

  • System Size

    389kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $56,681 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metered

  • Environmental Equivalents

    44,398,424 Smartphones Charged

At A Glance

  • System Size

    133.2kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $1,114,935

  • Utility Provider

    Madison Gas & Electric

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    14,727 Gallons of Gas

At A Glance

  • System Size

    25.7kw

  • Estimated Savings

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    26,293 Pounds of Coal

At A Glance

  • System Size

    26kw

  • Estimated Savings

  • Utility Provider

    Alliant Energy

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

At A Glance

  • System Size

    28.86kw

  • Estimated Savings

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metered

  • Environmental Equivalents

At A Glance

  • System Size

    43.6kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $151,039

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metered

  • Environmental Equivalents

    4,817,623 Smartphones Charged

At A Glance

  • System Size

    73.84kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $329,713

  • Utility Provider

    Plymouth Utilities

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

At A Glance

  • System Size

    64.845kw

  • Estimated Annual Savings

    $21,442

  • Utility Provider

    WPS

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

At A Glance

  • System Size

    133kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $386,522

  • Utility Provider

    Alliant Energy

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    12,550 Gallons of Gas

At A Glance

  • System Size

    26.6kw

  • Estimated Anual Savings

    $3,953

  • Utility Provider

    Alliant Energy

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    12,578 Pounds of Coal

At A Glance

  • System Size

    128.7kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $513,821

  • Utility Provider

    Manitowoc Public Utilites

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    13,964,512 Smartphones Charged

At A Glance

  • System Size

    45.5kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $275,531

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    4,679,952 Smartphones Charged

At A Glance

  • System Size

    1.825 MW

  • Estimated Savings

    $103,000 Annually

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Direct Sell Rate Tariff

  • Environmental Equivalents

    1,740,000 ton of CO2 emissions

At A Glance

  • System Size

    388.8kw

  • Annual Savings

    $51,288

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metering

  • Environmental Equivalents

    26,104 gallons of gasoline consumed. 22,789 gallons of diesel consumed. 256,673 pounds of coal burned. 3.1 tanker trucks' worth of gasoline.

At A Glance

  • System Size

    388.9kw

  • Annual Savings

    $51,340

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metering

  • Environmental Equivalents

    26,135 gallons of gasoline consumed. 22,815 gallons of diesel consumed. 256,973 pounds of coal burned. 3.1 tanker trucks' worth of gasoline.

At A Glance

  • System Size

    299.3kw

  • Annual Savings

    $42,934

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metering

  • Environmental Equivalents

    20,076 gallons of gasoline consumed. 17,526 gallons of diesel consumed information. 197,404 pounds of coal burned.

At A Glance

  • System Size

    50.7 kW - DC

  • Estimated Savings

    $10,329

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Line Side/Parallel Generation (CGS-NM)

  • Environmental Equivalents

    361,853lbs of coal burned annually

At A Glance

  • System Size

    31.87 kW

  • Estimated Savings

    $4,998 Anually

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Monthly Net Metering (CGS-NM)

  • Environmental Equivalents

    CO2 Emissions: 22.6 Metric Tons 2,341 Gallons of Gasoline

At A Glance

  • System Size

    370kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $1,053,732

  • Utility Provider

    Alliant Energy

  • Connection Type

    Parallel Generation

  • Environmental Equivalents

    401,786 lbs. of Coal or 44,218,770 smartphones charged.

At A Glance

  • System Size

    389kw

  • Estimated Savings

    $1,190,164

  • Utility Provider

    WE Energies

  • Connection Type

    Net Metering

  • Environmental Equivalents

    384,108 lbs. of Coal or 42,273,187 smartphones charged